Automated Work Cell

Team Do-All Robotics was tasked to improve the existing Robotic Workcell located in the Senior Design Suite. This project includes a second generation design of the workcell itself with hopes of making a sturdier, more modular work-cell that is able to handle tasks of higher precision and of a wider variety. The ME Department also assigned the team to create a standalone instruction manual that incoming teams could use as a resource to better understand the full capabilities of the DENSO Robotic Arm and be able to program the workcell to meet a wide variety of manufacturing needs

Background


2013-2014

In Spring 2013 The Boeing Company donated DENSO robotic arms to The University of Idaho College of Engineering. That fall Mechanical and Electrical Engineering students, as a part of Team Roboshow, were tasked to learn basic programming of the robotic arms and create a work-cell for the arms. Their work-cell incorporated multiple safety features as well as a clear poly-carbonate enclosure for public demonstration. The team was able to successfully program the robot to use a dry-erase marker to create logos and patterns on a white board.

2014-2015

The following year another design team, known as Team Vandalbot, was formed to design a manufacturing process which could assemble various rivet and nut-plate assemblies in order to automate a repetitive task currently done by factory workers. The team was able to demonstrate this process and provide documentation for future teams.

Previous Design Issues

There are a few critical problems with the existing work-cell design. When the robotic arm operates at high speeds the cell tends to wobble which decreases precision in manufacturing. The way the current work-cell is set up only allows for a limited number of configurations when developing a manufacturing process. Another problem facing the robotic arm work-cell is lack of documentation on operating the DENSO arms using included peripherals and developing programs using WINCAPS software. Previous teams' documentation includes many references to manuals that are difficult to find or include non-critical information.

Design Task
Problem Statement

The Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of Idaho requires certain updates to be made to their current Robotic Arm Work-cell. A 2nd generation work-cell needs to be developed to improve the cell’s flexibility in manufacturing capabilities such that it: incorporates a modular design, eliminates movement & vibration under load, and is able to include a second robotic arm. Standalone documentation of robot setup and operation should be compiled for future students.

 Project Design Goals 

1.	Create a workcell for an automated manufacturing process with a Denso robotic arm.
 * -	Improve upon the stability of the workcell to limit vibrations and motion that might cause errors during manufacturing.
 * -	 Create a modular workcell to allow for any kind of work surface or manufacturing process.

2.	Incorporate a second Denso robotic arm into the work cell.
 * -	Have both arms be controlled by one program.
 * -	Have both arms work on the same process simultaneously without interfering with each other.

3.	Explore the limits and possibilities of manufacturing processes with two Denso robotic arms.
 * -	See if the addition of a second arm adds any value to the process or just makes the process needlessly complicated.

Robot Pedestal
One of the main issues with the original workcell is that the method in which the robot was mounted in the workcell was not effective in keeping it steady. During operation at high speeds the robot would cause the base to rock back an forth which caused repeatably issues and made precision operation almost impossible. In order to fix this the DENSO installation manual was consulted and used to develop a pedestal out of ¼ inch square steel tubing. To ensure the pedestal would not move or deflect during use a finite element analysis was done considering the worst case torque loading from the arm swinging around and the worst case vertical loading where a mass on the arm could cause it to tip. Pictured to the left are the results of the FEA done in SolidWorks.



The maximum torsional deflection that the pedestal will see is 0.114mm. This is the linear distance from the original corner to the new position of the corner as it twists.

The maximum vertical deflection that the pedestal will see is 0.013mm.

After the pedestal was assembled, 8020 T-Slot aluminum was fastened to the outside edges so work surfaces could be attached. This T-Slot aluminum was used for most of the workcell construction.

Modular Table Work Surface
The new workcell needed to be reconfigured easily so future design groups would be able to change the work surface to best fit their needs for their particular project. A modular work surface was designed so that 24"x24" square tables could be added or subtracted in a grid to create the optimal working area.

Each work surface is 36" in height with adjustable feet to account for imperfections in the floor. This surface height has optimal ergonomics for workers to interact with the workcell for long periods of time in a typical manufacturing setting.  The tables have an 8020 T-Slot aluminum border around them so they can be attached to other tables an so accessories can be added to the work surface.

Enclosure Space
"Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem. Ut enim ad minima veniam, quis nostrum exercitationem ullam corporis suscipit laboriosam, nisi ut aliquid ex ea commodi consequatur? Quis autem vel eum iure reprehenderit qui in ea voluptate velit esse quam nihil molestiae consequatur, vel illum qui dolorem eum fugiat quo voluptas nulla pariatur?"

Instruction Manual


An instruction manual was being developed to accompany the redesigned workcell. Previous documentation for the workcell was lengthy and contained many references to outside sources that were difficult to find or more detailed than need be. The new workcell manual that has been developed is much shorter and will not require outside sources to teach the reader use of the workcell. This [[Media:16 doall our manual.pdf|current version]] was completed in September of 2016.

Instruction Manual Main Sections

I. Introduction with Project History

II. Safety Requirements

III. Teach Pendant Operation

IV. WINCAPS Software & Programming

V. Appendix
 * A. Error Codes & Common Fixes
 * B. PAC Library

Robot Operation
For the Fall semester we plan to continue fabrication of the workcell, a final design for the enclosure will be chosen the first week of the semester. We will also be creating a few demonstration programs

Drawing (Single Robot)

For this program a single robot will draw images on a stationary whiteboard.

Cup Stacking

Much like Speed Stacking the robot will stack cups as quickly as possible then take them down.

Drawing (Double Robot)

Like the first program a robot will draw an image, but the drawing surface will be moving as well.

Document Archive

 * [[Media:16 doall agendas.pdf|Meeting Agendas]]


 * [[Media:16 doall timeline.png|Detailed Summer Timeline with Goals and Milestones]]


 * [[Media:16 doall design review.pdf|Detailed Design Review Presentation]]


 * [[Media:16 doall our manual.pdf|Completed Instruction Manual (excluding appendixes)]]