3-Axis Center of Gravity Measurement Device

The goal of the project is to create a fixture for measuring the mass and center of gravity for standard Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories' (SEL) devices with complicated geometries and uneven weight distribution in all three dimensions.

=Problem Definition=

Background
SEL designs and manufactures many digital products ranging from transmission protection to control systems around the globe. To better understand the failure modes of the products, a series of mechanical analysis is performed by SEL. But Computer-Aided Design (CAD) models lack detailed information about component density, which leads to inaccurate measurement of the Center of Gravity (CG) of the product. By building a device, which measures the CG of the product automatically, using mass sensors will help to solve the issue of incorrect CG measurement of SEL products.

Deliverables
Proof of understanding of center of gravity measurement techniques Validation of functionality and robustness of the porototype using representative SEL components Proper documentation of the design ideas and measurements used in the project Record of bill of materials A detailed final reoprt of the project with a team presentation

Requirements
Calculates the center of gravity for complex objects in 3 dimensions​ Can measure objects approximately 20" cube down to the size of a cellphone​ Is completely automatic after the sample is inserted​ Displays a result within 3 seconds of measurement concluding​ Has an accuracy within 1% or 0.1 inches​ Hold a static load of 50 pounds​ Operate 1 year without maintenance​ Operate from a standard 120VAC outlet

=Project Learning=

Initial Design Ideas & Prototypes
This project was done by a capstone team in 2018-2019. So, at first, the ideas and works done by the previous team were studied. After brainstorming and research, two methods for the calculation of CG were decided by the team. Two different prototypes were also developed following those methods.

Compression method
The test platform is supported by three or more load cells, and the CG location is calculated from the difference in force measurement at these three points. Since the CG position is determined by small differences in weight measurement at these 3 points, huge CG errors can result from side loads using this method. In order to find the third component of CG, in the z-direction, the object being measured needs to be tilted to a known angle. When doing research on this method many academic papers and the handbook of measurements stated that it was important to tare the scales before placing the object on the test apparatus.

For the prototype development from this method, a square cardboard was used as the platform. A variety of solid objects with known CG such as aluminum cube and acrylic cylinder were used. Cheap amazon mass scales were used as load cells and the platform was glued to three nails and was on top of the scales.

Tension method
Similar to the compression method, a variety of solid objects with known CG were placed on the grid (see Prototype 2: Tension Method), then using the difference of weight on each scale the CG could be calculated. The major benefit of this prototype was having perpendicular forces; as the straps hang straight down. The purpose of this method to was to investigate whether the imprecise force angle on the compression prototype was causing significantly inaccurate results. Our findings suggested that either method could adequately be used to calculate the CG, but due to the clunky nature of the design and shapes of common SEL devices, the suspended tabletop would likely be an inconvenience when placing objects on and off the surface. Additional negatives on the design, deterioration on straps leading to inaccurate results, swaying of table surface, limiting object size due to leg interference.

The prototype design for this method is a piece of square plywood suspended by three luggage scales and the scales are resting on holes on a tabletop surface.

Statics method
Statics was used to derive equations for x-axis & y-axis CG. This was done by summing moments about F1 which was set origin with the coordinate system defined in the left diagram. The last equation for the z coordinate was derived using a second FBD of the table tilted to a known angle and using an object with a known x coordinate. The percent error found in the X & Y axis was within the product requirement but for the z-axis, the percent error was huge.

=Design Considerations=

=Final Design=

=Validation=

=Team Members=

=Additional Documentation=

Project Schedule



Meeting Minutes



Presentations



Client Interview