TATER: Tamper Analysis via Transient Electromagnetic Response

TATER is a tamper analysis system that monitors deterministic computer programs and detects unauthorized modifications. The TATER system functions when placed in close proximity to the target proessor. It works by capturing and comparing electromagnetic emanations from a target processor by using a correlation algorithm. The value of this project is that it can verify code integrity without requiring modification to the target software or hardware.

Background
In some situations, it may be impractical to physically modify a system in order to monitor it. Whether due to financial matters or system dependencies, this may worsen the severity of existing vulnerabilities since successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities may not be identified for days, or even years. The goal of TATER is to verify code integrity without requiring modification to the target system. It works in close proximity to the target processor by monitoring electromagnetic signals emanating from the processor and correlating them with an established baseline from code that is "known" to be good.

Specifications
Our product should not require modification of the target system. It should be sensitive enough to detect relatively small changes in the boot code but flexible enough to allow multiple configurations. It should be possible to update the monitoring system to continue correctly characterizing the boot code if it is updated. Analysis should take no longer than a couple of minutes.

Alternatives and Decisions
We considered using an FPGA to process signals, but ultimately decided that the best choice for research and development purposes would be to use Linux on a laptop. This is a diagram of our setup design:



Our strategy is to design an antenna to pick up electromagnetic signals emanating from a processor and analyze peaks in the frequency compared with an established baseline to identify modifications in the boot code. Various statistical analysis techniques may be of use in pursuing this goal.

Antenna Design
We are still considering alternatives for the final antenna design. One of the top candidates at this point is a ferrite rod. The other likely option is a patch antenna.

Algorithm Design
We are planning to use cross correlation to align our waveform sequences, which will also allow us to compare how similar the sequences are in regards to location of peaks and time in between. In addition to using cross correlation, we also intend to compare the amplitude of the corresponding peaks found using cross correlation.

Implementation and Testing
A probe and oscilloscope are used to capture electromagnetic signals emanating from the target processor. Captures from the same sequence of code produce a correlation of >99%, which is excellent. If instructions are added or removed, then this correlation falls significantly and the algorithm can detect these changes. Currently, we are able to detect single assembly-level instruction changes only if the instructions being modified are significantly different - such as replacing and ADD with a MOV. Changing an ADD to a much more similar SUB, on the other hand, is not significant enough for our current algorithm to register the difference. Complications such as background noise picked up along with the legitimate code emissions account for the <1% variation between captures on the same sequence of code, which makes it much harder to identify tiny changes such as replacing an ADD with a SUB as mentioned. Fortunately, most modifications would require multiple instruction changes in order to accomplish the intended purpose.

Test Results
To the left is an example of signals captured by an oscilloscope. To the right is a graph showing the difference between specific instructions and a NOP instruction.

Meeting Minutes






























Presentations and Monthly Status Reports