D3-TIG

Problem Definition
Design and build a functioning prototype of the VandalForge V2 3D printer to include: a more user friendly interface, ease of manufacturability, and increase printing capability while maintaining a relatively low manufacturing cost to allow for future retail sale.

Deliverables
Motion system: With 3D printing there are multiple well known motion control arrangements. We chose to go with what’s known as a CORE-XY motion system for several reasons. The first reason relates to client requirements, as the project mandates that we use a box style frame. With a box style frame the most efficient use of space for anything but a very small printer is to have the print head, or in our case a TIG nozzle and wire feed system, mobile in both the X and Y directions. To do this there are two common belt setups, one is called Hbot and the other is the aforementioned CORE-XY. While the Hbot is simpler, requiring significantly less belting and fewer pulleys, it applies a torquing force to the XY gantry that we concluded was less desirable than the extra cost and complication of implementing the CORE-XY system. In our design we also have to allow for a very stiff metal print bed that has active cooling to remove the heat from the welding process. In this we decided to have the print bed fixed and thus move the XY motion system in the Z direction as well. In doing this, we realized why every commercial printer, off the shelf kit and home build plans move the bed in the Z direction rather than the the XY system. It’s because moving the the XY system in the vertical is a lot more work. When moving only the bed the only forces that really need consideration are the vertical force of supporting the weight. When moving the XY system the vertical force of the system must be considered as well as dynamic forces on the system of the moving print head.

Control system: The control system of the 3D printer must govern multiple systems. First, it must control the XYZ movement of the printer. Second, it must control the characteristics of the weld by changing the power applied. Third, it must use feedback loops to ensure that the whole system runs smoothly, with as little human intervention as possible. To fill these requirements, we decided to use the Smoothieboard x5, given that the board has enough stepper motor outputs, as well as GPIO pins, to facilitate our system control.

Team Information
Sam Schaffer: Major: BS in Electrical Engineering, BS in Computer Engineering Hometown: Coeur d’Alene, ID Graduation Date: May 2018 Hobbies: Rock Climbing, skiing, cooking Email: scha3720@vandals.uidaho.edu Project Responsibilities: Controlling the welder via microcontroller, powering all components Plan After Graduation: Graduate School

Nathan Pabst: Major: BSME, BS Physics, Minor in Mathematics Hometown: Fruitland, ID Graduation Date:  December 2018 Hobbies: Spending time with my wife and daughter. Email: pabs5886@vandals.uidaho.edu Project Responsibilities: Take an active part in all design decisions and contingency/fringe planning, incorporation of welder into the motion system/final assembly, print bed configuration and cooling, and assist in soldering/desoldering components along with PCB configuration. Plan After Graduation: Find a job.

Zachary Hacker: Major: BSME Graduation Date: May 2018 Hobbies: 3D Printing Email: hack3582@vandals.uidaho.edu Project Responsibilities: Motion system and Enclosure Design

Yazeed Alotaibi: Major: BS in Electrical Engineering Hometown: Riyadh,Saudi Arabia Hobbies: Sports, reading, and drinking a hot coffee Email: alot4226@vandals.uidaho.edu Plan After Graduation: Find a job Project Responsibilities: Controlling the welder via microcontroller, powering all components and wikipage