Mapping Rabbit Burrows 2015

The pygmy rabbit (Brachylagus idahoensis) is a North American rabbit, and is one of only two rabbit species in America to dig its own burrow. An isolated subspecies in the Columbia River Basin is listed as endangered by the United States. . The burrowing owls of North America, who raise their young in burrows dug by other animals, are also of interest to researchers at the University of Idaho. Current methods for exploring burrows are either ineffective or invasive, with the leading tool for exploration being a camera attached to a single flexible rod. This limits the type of structures the device can enter and the depth it can reach. The goal of this project is to design and build a device that can enter a burrow to collect video, volume measurements, and a 3D map of the structure. The current iteration of the project aims to write a software interface for controlling the vehicle designed in 2014-15 and collecting data.

Problem Definition
The goal of this project is to design a system for controlling and collecting spatial data from the existing burrow-exploring vehicle.

Background
Pygmy rabbits dig burrows into the ground, which help to keep them safe from predators and the cold. These burrows also affect the soil density, temperature, and water retention of the soil. Analyzing the structure of these burrows can lead to a deeper understanding of these issues as well as the lives of pygmy rabbits. Burrowing owls raise their young in structures dug by other animals that are equally important to understand.

Burrows can be difficult to access by conventional means. The best current method involves using a camera attached to a flexible rod. When more information is needed, digging can be utilized, but is destructive to the animals' habitat. The following properties are believed to be typical of pygmy rabbit burrows, and demonstrate the accessibility challenge.


 * Burrows have a diameter between three and eighteen inches.
 * On average, burrows have typically between three and five entrances, with an expected maximum of fourteen entrances.
 * Burrows are between a meter and one and one-half meters under ground.
 * Each burrow entrance will be between two and three meters away from other entrances.

2014 Vehicle Specifications
The requirements for the project are as follows.

The vehicle must:
 * Fit inside wide range of rabbit burrows
 * Take measurements of the burrow space which may be used to provide volumetric data
 * Record images of the burrow interior to be used by client
 * Record all relevant data and return to the surface in a timely manner
 * Be usable by the client with no special skills
 * Operate for a period of one hour

2014 Project State
Objective: To determine the state of the project as it was handed to us in September 2015, after the completion of the previous iteration in May 2015.

Methodology: Each team member carefully examined last year's wiki page and the contents of the dropbox folder we received from the clients containing work from last year's group.

Findings and Analysis:
 * The designed method for transmitting video from the vehicle is an analog signal over a coaxial video cable.
 * A composite to USB converter is intended for use in reading this signal on a computer in real-time.
 * The full quality video from the forward camera is also recorded to the on-board DVR.
 * It is unclear how the rear camera footage is transmitted.
 * The specifications for the distance sensors chosen indicate that their maximum range is 10cm. This could pose a problem for burrows up to 18in. (46cm) wide or at junctions.
 * The computer in the vehicle has a 454 MHz ARM processor and 64 MB of RAM.
 * The following hardware items had not yet been addressed and were included on the "To-Do" List given us:
 * Mount LED light source
 * Construct a durable, keyed tether for burrow exploration
 * Attach accelerometer
 * Mount range finder array
 * Purchase a connector for battery charging
 * Wire in begin and stop recording commands, utilizing the existing button on the DVR
 * Identify the correct camera failure modes
 * Install an external power switch.
 * In addition, we noted that the forward camera was not wired to anything.
 * The following software items were included on the "To-Do" List:
 * Create a comprehensive user interface
 * Write code for sensor data storage
 * Implement a method to create a 3D map from points obtained by sensor readings
 * Implement a method for estimating burrow volume
 * The file "Tech Presentation Final" suggests black and white 640x480 video is captured, whereas the wiki indicated 1280x720 video.
 * Battery recharges in about 1.5 hours from "almost any power source", though it's not clear what that means, since the "To-Do" List included purchasing an adapter for charging.
 * The existing C code implemented keyboard controls for the motors that were not simple or easy to learn/remember.

Range Sensor Analysis
Objective: Determine the accuracy, range, and electrical characteristics that can be expected from the STMicroelectronics VL6180X Proximity sensors purchased by the 2014-15 team.

Methodology: Analyse datasheet and perform manual tests

Findings and Analysis: The observed maximum sensor range was about 15cm. In cases where a burrow is 18in. (46cm) wide, this will still not reach halfway across the tunnel. However, this is significantly better than the 10cm. range suggested by the specifications from the vendor. The small maximum range may still negatively impact the vehicle's ability to create maps and estimate burrow volume. The minimum accurate range appears to be 1cm. This should be acceptable most of the time, since only some portions of the burrows should be so small that the vehicle can barely traverse through them. Additionally, the error at distances that small should not significantly impact the relative error of volume estimates. Lower light levels seemed to improve performance. Strong, directed light sources at a low angle of incidence could drop the maximum range to 5-6 cm.

The distance sensors all communicate using the same predefined address over the I2C serial protocol; the address conflict will present challenges when we try and wire more than one together. They also operate at a lower voltage than the normal logic levels used in the robot hardware. Our electrical team will need to prepare some custom circuitry to drive an array of these sensors.

Team Members
.

Sponsors
Dr. Courtney Conway received a B.S. in Wildlife Biology from Colorado State University, an M.S. in Zoology from the University of Wyoming, and a Ph.D. in Organismal Biology and Ecology from the University of Montana. He works on applied questions to aid wildlife managers make informed decisions, and also works on basic questions to better understand the ecological processes that affect behavior and demography of animal populations.

Dr. Janet Rachlow is a mammalian ecologist interested in behavior and conservation of both rare and common mammals. Her current research focuses on habitat relationships of diverse species, with an emphasis on understanding the consequences of habitat modification. Rachlow along with her students and collaborators conduct field and laboratory studies to address questions that can help manage and conserve wildlife and their habitats. Janet enjoys outdoor activities and Idaho’s terrific wildland resources.

Instructors
Bruce Bolden received his bachelor's degree and master's degree in mechanical engineering from the University of California, Davis. His graduate research involved simulation of the Electron Beam Welding process. Following graduation he worked in the aerospace industry for several companies before joining a small mathematical software company in 1990 as the Engineering Manager. Prior to joining the University of Idaho in 1997, Bruce worked on the development of several Microsoft Windows applications.

Dr. Joel C. Perry is a new member of the Mechanical Engineering Department as an assistant professor with a focus on robotics and engineering design. He received a B.Sc. degree in mechanical engineering from Gonzaga University in 2000, and M.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees in mechanical engineering from the University of Washington, in 2002 and 2006 respectively. Dr. Perry spent the past 6 years working abroad in the Department of Rehabilitation Technologies at Tecnalia Research & Innovation in San Sebastian, Spain, where he managed R&D activities in the development of low-cost solutions for upper extremity rehabilitation. Before joining Tecnalia, Dr. Perry was involved in the development of a 7 degree-of-freedom (dof) arm exoskeleton, a 5-dof high precision positioning robot, a 5-dof surgical simulator, a novel 2-dof surgical grasper, and a 1-dof powered prosthesis for early-stance gait improvements in trans-tibial amputees. His research interests include enabling technologies for upper and lower limb disability, rehabilitation robotics, and surgical robotics.

Document Archive

 * [[File:2014_RabMap_ToDoList.pdf]]
 * [[File:2015_Rabmap_ClientInterviewTranscript.pdf]]
 * [[File:2015_RabMap_Snapshot1.pdf]]