Single-Stage Water Filter with Dual Sand Media Sizes
The goal of the project is to develop a filtration system that utilizes two sand sizes to increase the efficiency of clearing water of suspended solids.
Problem Definition[edit]
Scope:
Form multidisciplinary engineering design team to explore novel approaches to efficiently integrate two similar water treatment stages into one. Designs and deliverables will inform sustainable water reuse and recovery systems and form a foundation for next generation treatment technologies.
Background[edit]
Water filtration systems are useful tools for removing contaminants from water. This is done all around the world for many reasons, from agriculture work, food processing, and even simply making a source of clean drinking water. There are also many forms of filtration systems. Systems that use sand as the filter have been used for many years, as sand filtering is one of the best methods of cleaning water. Currently at the University of Idaho campus are two of these filtering systems that each use a different sand, with the water going through both systems. Combining those systems so that water is filtered with two sands within a single cycle would be a beneficial improvement.
Deliverables[edit]
Fall
Specifications[edit]
- Minimum 75% separation of the two sand sizes.
- Chemical and corrosion resistance.
- Minimum upflow rate of 1.8 gallons per minute.
- Maintain a bed turnover rate of 0.7 to 1.4 inches per minute.
- Continuous operation with a maximum of 30 minutes of routine weekly maintenance.
Design Considerations[edit]
- Assessing wear on components
- Airlift with Dual Inlets
- Achieving 75% sand separation
Project Learning[edit]
Design One
- Water turbine forces sand to the sides of the box
- The two sands move to have the fine sand against the walls while the coarse sand is closer to the augur
- A swirled layering of fine and coarse sand occurs, like soft serve ice cream
Cons:
- exacerbates erosion on surfaces with sand
- Maintaining pressure head can be difficult without the use of a pump
- Turbine and augur system add substantial complexity and cost to the system
Design Two
- Sand Separation using Elutriation.
- Separated beds to ensure particle segregation.
- Water up flow through channels separates particles based on unique settling Velocities
Cons:
- Changes in head pressure affect velocities
- Concentric Tubes do not allow multiple airlift inputs
- Separated beds may results in emptying/filling bed areas
- Difficult to test and adjust up flow velocities.
Design Three
- Segregation using Wedge wire screen
- Bed segregation created by different outlet locations.
- Airlift with two inlets.
Considerations:
- Airlift inlet may result in contaminated sand getting deposited into fine bed.
- Bed turnover / airlift inlet rate must ensure no clogging from Course outlet.
- Brazilian Nut affect (Coarse sand migrating upward)
- Ensure 75% segregation.
- Test stand fully built and ready to be implemented
Ideas
- Separates particles by elutriation
- Lighter particles are moved upwards by the airstream and heavier particles can fall through
Final Design[edit]
Wash Box
The wash box is the main point of this project. This is where the airlifts move the sand to be separated mechanically using a perforated sheet. The airlifts move the sand into separate compartments of the wash box to increase separation efficiency. There is an outflow hole that would be used for the effluent in the case of the system in a real-world situation. After the sand moves through the compartments, being separated into either the fine sand or coarse sand outflow pipes, both sizes are moved through a torturous path that is meant to remove the contaminants from the sand itself before being moved into the appropriate beds.
Piping
The piping systems allows sand and water to be moved through the wash box and test stand. Influent water is pumped into the test stand. The water rises and passes through the sand beds and filtered clean water exits through one port, and dirty wastewater exits another.
Bed Separator
The bed separator provides the system a way for the airlifts to move the sand without any unnecessary mixing of the sand. In addition, this allows the system a way for the outflow sand pipes to move down to the appropriate bed.
Test Stand
The test stand is constructed of ¾” acrylic panes. They are fastened together with a strong adhesive. The acrylic allows one to see through the test stand and see the components and water and sand.
Cart
The cart on which our apparatus was attached was a sturdy metal dolly. This allowed for easy transport. Square metal rods were welded to the cart, around the test stand to provide structural integrity and support.
Performance Testing
To analyze the effectiveness of the water filter at maintaining bed separation, a random sample was taken from the fine bed and weighed before any filtering took place. After the mass of the mixed sand was taken, the sand was filtered through the same perforated sheets as used in the design of the device. All the particles that fell through the screen were correctly placed in the right bed, while any residual particles were a result of incorrect separation. The governing equation for testing is,
Where %filtration is how much correct sand filtration is occurring in each bed, and m is the mass of each sample.
Upon running this analysis with the wet sand, the % filtration rate was found to be 84% on average. This was found to be higher than our requirement of >75% separation therefore deeming our objective met for separation.
Improving Designs
The biggest design improvement would be creating a part to allow sand up flow into a single up flow pipe. A prototype part was designed for the capstone project, but it needed further design testing to enable proper suction. The part that was designed was a couple with holes in the side that would act as suction holes. In concept, this would suck sand in from the fine bed while having the up flow pipes grab coarse sand and then mix it on its way to the wash box. If this part could be further developed, only one up flow pipe would be necessary, and it may free up additional space in the tank while increasing volumetric flow rates of sand.
Validation[edit]
Clean water is arguably the world’s most valuable resource; therefore, it is important to invest in water filtration technology. Currently the U of I’s Clean Water Machine design is a two-stage dual media sand filter, but by refining the design to require a single filtration stage, a significant reduction in maintenance and increased efficiency can hopefully be achieved.
Team Members[edit]
[[File: |thumb|left]] |
Jaden Cavender Major: Mechanical Engineering
|
[[File: |thumb|left]] |
Tayson Thompson Major: Biological Engineering |
[[File: |thumb|left]] |
Ben Marek Major: Mechanical Engineering |
[[File:|180px|thumb|left]] |
Blake Urie Major: Biological Engineering |
[[File:|180px|thumb|left]] |
Tobias Flores-Wentz Major: Biological Engineering |
Additional Documentation[edit]
Project Schedule
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Gantt Chart.pdf
File:Spring 2021 Hydration Station Gantt Chart.pdf
Meeting Minutes
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes -1.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes 2.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes 3.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes 4.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes 5.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes 6.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes 7.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes 8.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes 9.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes 10.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes 11.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes 12.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes 13.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes 14.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes 15.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes 16.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes 17.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes 18.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes 19.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes 20.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes 21.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes 22.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes 23.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes 24.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes 25.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes 26.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes 27.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes 28.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes 29.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes 30.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes 31.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes 32.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes 33.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes Snapshot 1.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes Design Review.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Minutes Snapshot 2.pdf
Presentations
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Snapshot 1 Presentation.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Design Review Presentation.pdf
File:Fall 2020 Hydration Station Snapshot 2 Presentation.pdf
File:Spring 2021 Hydration Station Engineering Design Review.pdf
File:Spring 2021 Hydration Station Snapshot 3 Presentation.pdf
File:Spring 2021 Hydration Station Final Technical Presentation.pdf
File:Spring 2021 Hydration Station Final Design Poster.pdf
Client Interview